450 SO2D 336 - M.C. v. State

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2005

15 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

COWART, Judge.

¶1When (1) a police officer encounters a person under circumstances1 that authorize the officer to temporarily detain that person under Florida’s Stop and Frisk statute (§ 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1983)) and (2) in the lawful execution of his legal duties the police officer intends to detain that person for the purpose of ascertaining the person’s identity and to learn the circumstances surrounding his presence, and (3) under the facts and circumstances of the particular case that person learns, knows, or understands that the officer desires to detain that person, then if that person flees or takes other intentional action that prevents lawful detention, he may be guilty of obstructing or opposing such officer in violation of section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1983). See Price v. State, 318 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 334 So.2d 607 (Fla.1976). See also Johnson v. State, 433 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Burgess v. State, 313 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), relates to the constitutional right to refuse to provide information and is distinguishable.

¶2AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.

¶3. As to reasonable suspicion justifying detention and inquiry, see State v. Hunt, 391 So.2d 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); as to probable cause, see State v. Jones, 417 So.2d 788 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).