456 So. 2d 359 - Duncan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1993
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. New York · 408 So. 2d 551 - Taylor v. State · Graddick v. State · 54 Ala. App. 115 - Davis v. State · 57 Ala. App. 568 - Bennett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In non-jury cases, the judgment of the trial court, when based on testimony ore tenus, will be affirmed unless the judgment was clearly wrong or so contrary to the weight of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust." (Citations omitted). Duncan v. State , 456 So.2d 359 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), affirmed , 456 So.2d 362 (Ala. 1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he subrogation rights of the insurers or the question as to whether or not the insurers should have been included in the restitution order are not properly before this court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.