Sertic v. Cuyahoga, Lake, Geauga & Ashtabula Counties Carpenters District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America’s Empirical Analysis
459 F.2d 579 · 1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2001
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 412
Relies on Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · Langnes v. Green · James Ray McCraw v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada and Local 43 of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, James Ray McCraw v. Local 43 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada · Cohen v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f such notice to the class and opportunity to present adverse claims was not required ..., we would be forced to conclude that appellant ... has no standing to bring the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gottlieb v. Wiles“like a defendant who is summoned by process of court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.