Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

460 So. 2d 864

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 13, 1984

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1984-11-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1993

Relies on Armstrong v. State · 451 So. 2d 367 - King v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-11-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

¶1The judgment in this case was reversed and the cause remanded because the trial *865judge failed to prepare a written statement as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking the appellant’s probation. King v. State, 451 So.2d 367 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984).

¶2In response to the order of reversal and remand, the trial judge prepared a written order of his findings and reasons in compliance with Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). Subsequently, this Court set aside its order of reversal and restored the cause to the docket.

¶3The judgment of the circuit court revoking appellant’s probation is affirmed.

¶4AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
/460/so2d/864 · .json · Public domain