Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 SW2D 310 - Phelps v. State

Phelps v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 164 Tex. Crim. 265 - Aguero v. State · 167 Tex. Crim. 309 - Saddler v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 305 - Angle v. State · 170 Tex. Crim. 30 - Parnell v. State · Welch v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the existence of a motive is not essential to a conviction, nevertheless the presence or absence of a motive for a crime is obviously a factor that is related to the question of the defendant’s guilt or innocence. Consequently, proof of any existing motive for the offense is generally held admissible, . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where two or more people take part in the commission of a felony, evidence of the conspiracy is admissible even though the substantive crime of conspiracy is not charged in the indictment.” Phelps v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 462 S.W.2d 310, 311 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Evidence of the commission of other crimes by the accused is admissible to show a possible motive for his commission of the crime with which he is charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.