United States v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.3d 887 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3561 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Rodriguez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]robation constitutes a type of sentence in and of itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Anderson“may be sentenced to a term of probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.