Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

465 F.2d 998

Docket No. 72-1305.

Jackson v. Richardson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 21, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1972.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-08-21

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1988

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Hudson D. Harmon v. Robert O. Finch, Etc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1972-08-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Thomas F. Jackson, in pro. per.

¶2William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Rex Heeseman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Ange-les, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Jackson brought this action under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, disallowing Jackson’s application for establishment of a period of disability, 42 U.S.C. § 416 (i), and for disability insurance benefits, 42 U.S.C. § 423. The hearing examiner concluded that Jackson had not shown that he was under a disability, as defined in the Act, on or before the expiration of his eligibility, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. Upon review, the district court granted the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment.

¶6There was substantial evidence upon which the hearing examiner could and did find that Jackson was not suffering a disability prior to the end of his eligibility period. That is the end of the matter. See Harmon v. Finch, 9 Cir., 1972, 460 F.2d 1229.

¶7Affirmed.

/465/f2d/998 · .json · Public domain