Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 466 F.2d 1267 - Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.

Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

466 F.2d 1267 · 1972

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
May 1990
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1990 · most notably Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For (1976), Stelling v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1547 (1978)

21 federal appellate ·

180197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 412 · 29 U.S.C. § 529

Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Walling US v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co · Graves v. United States · Salzhandler v. Caputo · International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Braswell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person whose rights secured by the provisions of this subchapter have been infringed by any violation of this subchapter may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States for such relief (including injunctions) as may be appropriate. . . . ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he court should take into account the fact that it was only after this action was brought that the defendant decided to stop the conduct complained of. In that sense, the action was effective in procuring relief, even though no injunction was issued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.