Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 467 P3D 605 - PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE

PUNDYK (EDWARD) VS. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. State · McLellan v. State · Ochoa v. State · Estes v. State · Winiarz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] qualified expert witness may testify regarding whether the defendant meets the elements of the not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity plea under NRS 174.035(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[k]now or understand the nature and capacity of his or her act; or. . . [a]ppreciate that his or her conduct was wrong due to a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a direct opinion on the ultimate conclusion that a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity or the converse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.