Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2005
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 1009 - Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. International Harvester · 154 So. 2d 625 - Gamble v. New Orleans Housing Mart, Inc. · Southern Land Title Corp. v. City of New Orleans · State ex rel. Sunseri v. Thoman · Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]ithholding consent is `unreasonable' where there are no `sufficient grounds for a reasonably prudent business person to deny consent.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The lessee has a right to underlease, or even to cede his lease to another person, unless this power has been expressly interdicted. The interdiction may be for the whole, or for a part; and this clause is always construed strictly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Truschinger v. Pak“Lessee is not permitted to rent or sub-let ... without the written consent of the Lessor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.