474 F. Supp. 2d 1175 - Kim v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 706 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams · Tw Electrical Service Inc Nn v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association · Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.