¶1MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
¶2In this civil OUI case, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C (Supp.1983-1984), the record amply supports the District Court’s finding that the police officer had an articulable suspicion justifying his second investigative stop of defendant. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Rowe, 453 A.2d 134, 136 (Me.1982). The other issues raised by defendant merit no discussion.
¶3The entry is:
¶4Judgment affirmed.
¶5All concurring.