Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 477 F.2d 217 - United States v. Floyd

United States v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis

477 F.2d 217 · 1973

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably United States v. Floyd (2014), United States v. Maxwell (2001)

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

25019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 1382 · 44 U.S.C. § 1501 · 5 U.S.C. § 500 · 50 U.S.C. § 797

Relies on Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Cole v. United States · Cheff v. Schnackenberg · Cataldo v. United States · Patterson v. Medberry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation; ****** “Shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “They were warned by the sign, the five security guards, and the fence around the installation. In any event there can be no question that the sign and the security guards gave the appellants actual notice that they could enter only with the permission of the base commander. The record is clear that they were informed of the denial of their right of entrance before they entered the base.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) Posted with warning signs at all perimeter gates and along the base perimeter. (b) Patrolled internally by air police forces in vehicles. Air police forces will be assigned at perimeter gates, when open, to control personnel and vehicle traffic. (c) Fenced around the perimeter, when practicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.