IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAFAEL CEZAR DANAM, No. 82036
Petitioner,
vs.
ELAINE KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL FILE
CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL ALIANTE
SOMERSET CHARTER, DEC 1 1 2020
ELIZABETH A BROM
Res • ondent. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
By
oEpirn, CLERK
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se "Petition for Extraordinary Writ for
U.S. Constitution Violation from U.S. District Court of Nevada." Having
considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted
because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to
him either by way of filing a civil complaint in the Eighth Judicial District
Court, or an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit to the extent he seeks to challenge the dismissal of his federal
complaint. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,
(2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no
plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and petitioner bears the burden
of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petiAn DEN!ED.1
, C.J.
Pickering
Hardesty Silver
'Petitioner's December 4, 2020, motion for surnmary judgment is
denied.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I907A 441110,
cc: Rafael Cezar Danarn
Law Office of Gary P. Sinkeldam APC
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA 2
( 0) 19471s 4.41EP.
