Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 478 P.3d 324 - State v. Stanley

State v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gunby · State v. Hebert · State v. Jamison · State v. Scott · State v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t requires a period, however brief, of thoughtful, conscious reflection and pondering— done before the final act of killing—that is sufficient to allow the actor to change his or her mind and abandon his or her previous impulsive intentions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “both a temporal element (time) and a cognitive element (consideration).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “'Premeditation does not have to be present before a fight, quarrel, or struggle begins. Premeditation is the time of reflection or deliberation. Premeditation does not necessarily mean that an act is planned, 12 contrived or schemed beforehand. . . . Premeditation can occur during the middle of a violent episode, struggle or fight.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.