¶1We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation and his convictions for grand theft and burglary. Of the issues raised alleging errors in sentencing, we find merit in only one issue. We agree with appellant that credit for time served should apply equally to all concurrent sentences. Woolley v. State, 459 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Martin v. State, 452 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), Bevins v. State, 412 So.2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record before us reflects that two of appellant’s four concurrent sentences specified 120 days credit for jail time while the other two concurrent sentences authorized seventy-nine days credit for jail time. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cases bearing circuit court numbers 83-1719 and 83-5782 with directions that the trial court make the appropriate corrections for jail time credit.
478 So. 2d 885
478 So.2d 885
10 Fla.L.Weekly 2616
Abbott v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 22, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-11-22
Relies on 452 So. 2d 938 - Martin v. State · 412 So. 2d 456 - Bevins v. State · Woolley v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1985-11-22
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2003 · most notably 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State (2003), 536 So. 2d 321 - Jaggers v. State (1988)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →