Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Malik v. State · Curry v. State · Stuhler v. State · Landrian v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a part of a person's ... body is damaged or does not work well, esp. when the condition amounts to a disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Texas courts have interpreted 'impairment' to include the diminished function of a bodily organ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meza v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.