Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

48 F. 224

Falk v. Seidenberg

United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York · decided 1891-11-12

<p>In Equity. Suit to restrain infringement of copyright. On demurrer to hill.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Waterman v. Mackenzie · Falk v. Schumacher

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Demurrer overruled · Decided 1891-11-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1942

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

40189119001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Equity. Suit to restrain infringement of copyright. On demurrer to hill.

¶2Demurrer overruled.

¶3Isaae N. Falk and lio'land Cox, for plaintiff.

¶4John B. Talmage and Augustus T. Gurlitz, for defendants.

¶5Coxe, J.

¶6The decision in Falk v. Schumacher, 48 Fed. Rep. 222, disposes of this cause also. The demurrer is overruled. The defendants may answer within 20 days.

/48/f1d/224 · .json · Public domain