¶1Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
¶2For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Scudder, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 11.
¶3For reversal — None.
48 N.J. Eq. 302
Kirkpatrick v. Corning
Decided March 15, 1891
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1891-03-15
The syllabus of the opinion rendered in the court of chancery is as follows; 1. Held: that although the mortgagee did not authorize the announcement so made at the sale, yet relief could be afforded either by a re-sale, or by permitting redemption on equitable terms, and the latter method was adopted in this case.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1891-03-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1999
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →