Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 480 SO2D 104 - Hurley v. Slingerland

Hurley v. Slingerland’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2016

9 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 474 So. 2d 212 - Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co. · The Florida Bar v. Jameison · 415 So. 2d 765 - Bergen Brunswig Corp. v. STATE, ETC. · Brooker v. State · 400 So. 2d 1031 - Broward County v. Sattler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) The existence of a fund over which the court has jurisdiction and from which fees can be awarded; 2) The commencement of litigation by one party which is terminated successfully; 3) The existence of a class which received, without otherwise contributing to the lawsuit, substantial benefits as a result of the litigation; 4) The creation, preservation, protection or increase of the fund as a direct and proximate result of the efforts of counsel for that party; 5) A reasonable relationship between the benefit established and the fees incurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.