¶1MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
¶2Charles Pratt appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401. Pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 52(b), Pratt alleges the trial court committed obvious error in instructing the jury. We disagree. Reading the instructions in their entirety, we find no obvious error or defect affecting Pratt’s *609substantial rights. State v. Smith, 472 A.2d 948, 950-51 (Me.1984).
¶3The entry is:
¶4Judgment affirmed.
¶5All concurring.