Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

484 F.2d 960

Docket No. 73-1339.

Allen v. Nelson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1973-10-09

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1983

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Allen v. Nelson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1973-10-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Edward P. O'Brien, Asst. Attys. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

William Mandel, David T. Alexander, Petty, Andrews, Tufts & Jackson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.

Before BROWNING, TRASK, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court's order is affirmed.

/484/f2d/960 · .json · Public domain