Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

486 A.2d 1191

State v. Ellis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 25, 1985

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1985-01-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1985

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Doody

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

¶2Shawn Ellis appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Aroostook County, of trafficking in a schedule X drug, in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1983). Tried as an accomplice, Ellis contends that the State produced insufficient evidence of his specific intent to promote or facilitate the crime as required by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 57(3)(A) (1983).

¶3Carefully reviewing the record in the light most favorable to the State, we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could reasonably have inferred Ellis’s intent. State v. Doody, 434 A.2d 523, 529-30 (Me.1981).

¶4The entry is:

¶5Judgment affirmed.

¶6All concurring.

/486/a2d/1191 · .json · Public domain