State v. Moret’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2011
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Robbins · State v. Peterson · State v. West · Hutcheson v. Iowa District Court for Lee County · State, Department of Transportation v. Marvin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. District associate judges have the jurisdiction provided in section 602.6405 for magistrates.... 2. District associate judges also have jurisdiction in civil actions for money judgement where the amount in controversy does not exceed five thousand dollars, ... jurisdiction of indictable misdemeanors, and felony violations of section 321 J.2, and the jurisdiction provided in section 602.7101 when designated as a judge of the juvenile court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n determining the period of time the habitual offender is to be barred, ... it is appropriate for the district judge to consider the time at which the petition was brought by the State in relation to the dates of convictions as shown on the abstract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moret“[t]he suspension of licenses of habitual offenders is designed, not to punish the offender, but to protect the public from those who persistently refuse to obey the statute[s]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.