Ex Parte Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 district · 70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 587 So. 2d 1218 - White v. State (1990), 574 So. 2d 921 - King v. State (1990)
1 district · 70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 452 So. 2d 508 - Ex Parte Edwards · 481 So. 2d 1154 - Ex Parte State · 481 So. 2d 1151 - Whirley v. State · State v. Nowlin · 486 So. 2d 482 - Berard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) It is established by proof of the same or fewer than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; or”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crear v. State · Ward v. State“The error in this approach is that [it] creates a broad rule which fails to take into account the facts of each case. [It] considers the potential relationship of the [two] statutes only in abstract terms and completely ignores the facts of this case and the indictment under which [the defendant] was charged. We find this application of § 13A-1-9 to these statutes and facts erroneous.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crear v. State · Childers v. State“"A person acts recklessly with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation."”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McLaughlin v. State · Ex Parte Long
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.