¶1In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mi*. Justice Carter are of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice IIocker and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that it should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ..... 37 South. Rep. 51, and Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. .... 37 South. Rep. 742, an order will be entered affirming the judgment from which the writ of error was taken.
49 Fla. 178
Holton v. Patterson
Decided January 15, 1905
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1905-01-15
<p>This ease was decided by the Court En Banc.</p> <p>Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hamilton County, •</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1906
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1905-01-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →