Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.3d 1158 - Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents

Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents’s Empirical Analysis

492 F.3d 1158 · 2007

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Gee v. Pacheco (2010), Cohen v. Longshore (2010)

9 federal appellate · 9 district ·

610200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Erickson v. Pardus · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Jones v. Bock · Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Courts should look to the specific allegations in the complaint to determine whether they plausibly support a legal claim for relief." Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C., 493 F.3d 1210 , 1215 n. 2 (10th Cir.2007). "[T]o state a claim in federal court, a complaint must explain what each defendant did to him or her; when the defendant did it; how the defendant's action harmed him or her, and what specific legal right the plaintiff believes the defendant violated."”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for a district court to exercise soundly its discretion in imposing such a result, it must first consider certain criteria.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Dismissing a case with prejudice, however, is a [harsh] remedy[-]the death penalty of pleading punishments ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.