¶1MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
¶2The defendant was convicted of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County). The only claim on appeal is that the evidence of his identification as the perpetrator was insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction. After a careful review of the record, we find that the jury rationally could have found proof of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Durgan, 467 A.2d 165, 166-67 (Me.1983); State v. McKenney, 459 A.2d 1093, 1096 (Me.1983).
¶3Therefore, the entry is:
¶4Judgment affirmed.
¶5All concurring.