Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 SW2D 799 - Mennis v. State

Mennis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1973
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Clemons v. State · 155 Tex. Crim. 290 - Garbs v. State · Millman v. State · Black v. State · Botley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The recitations in the instrument entitled ‘Order Revoking Probation’ are not sufficient that the instrument may also serve as the sentence in this case. It does not reflect that the appellant was present when the sentence was imposed, as required by Article 42.02, V.A.C.C.P. and see Garbs v. State, [supra].” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There appears no fixed or inflexible form to be used for the sentence. The one mandatory provision is that it ‘shall be pronounced in the presence of the defendant * * *.’ Art. 768, C.C.P. [Now Art. 42.03].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.