United States v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis
494 F.2d 424 · 1974
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably United States v. Bertoli (1994), United States v. Provenzano (1980)
34 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3432 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Remmer v. United States · Cole v. United States · Yi Au Lau v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unequivocally stated that she could no longer hear and decide the case fairly and impartially that the [district] Court had no recourse but to excuse her from further jury service.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Deprivation of a defendant’s right to be present at every stage of trial is subject to the harmless error rule and exchanges between the judge and jurors will not constitute reversible error lacking showing of clear prejudice to the absent defendant. United States v. Freed, 460 F.2d 75 (10th Cir. 1972); United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972); Little v. United States, 73 F.2d 861 (10th Cir. 1934).” United States v. Baca, 494 F.2d 424 , 428 (10th Cir. 1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“$ # H< H< $ (5) has a charge pending against him for the commission of, or has been convicted in a State or Federal court of record of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year and his civil rights have not been restored. The defendant shall be present at the arraignment, at the time of the plea, at every stage of the trial including the impaneling of the jury and the return of the verdict, and at the imposition of sentence, except as otherwise provided by this rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.