Barton v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Craig v. Chater · Coffman v. Bowen · Wilkins v. Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services · United States v. Christman · 406 F. Supp. 2d 1038 - Masch v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ue to the ALJ's failure to . . . provide an explanation of why some, but not all, of the limitations found [in the Psychiatric Review Technique Form] were adopted by him, the undersigned is not able to determine whether this evidence was properly evaluated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Snow v. SSA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.