Graves v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2008
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. State · Wagner v. State · Nacoff v. State · Morgan v. State · Richey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An amendment is one of form and not substance if a defense under the original information would be equally available after the amendment and the accused's evidence would apply equally to the information in either form. Further, an amendment is of substance only if it is essential to making a valid charge of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fajardo v. State“(5) the use of alternative or disjunctive allegations as to the acts, means, intents, or results charged. sfc * * * * (9) any other defect which does not prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant. [Our emphasis.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[mjug shots are not per se inadmissible [and] are admissible if (1) they are not unduly prejudicial and (2) they have substantial independent probative value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boatright v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.