Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 498 So. 2d 1003 - Moore v. State

498 So. 2d 1003 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1989
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 489 So. 2d 25 - Scurry v. State · 492 So. 2d 1308 - Williams v. State · State v. Werner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In spite of his demonstrated willingness to help the police, the prosecutor did not move for mitigation, partly because the police knew the supplier before Moore identified him; thus Moore did not render substantial assistance with the meaning of section 893.135(3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.