¶1Noel Escofil, in pro per.
¶2Robert Patrick Coyne, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
¶3Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.
ORDER
¶5PER CURIAM:
¶6Order affirmed. 46 Pa.Cmwlth. 475, 406 A.2d 850.
499 Pa. 207
452 A.2d 1012
Escofil v. Com.
Noel Tancred ESCOFIL, Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1982-12-10
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2018
8 state decisions
Relies on 46 Pa. Commw. 475 - Escofil v. Commonwealth
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1982-12-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →