¶1We have no douht in this case. It falls within the principle of Carkhuff v. Anderson. John Ely had an interest greater than leasehold; eventually it might be fee simple. We are of opinion, that the judgment should be affirmed.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
5 Serg. & Rawle 124
Ely v. Beaumont
Decided April 6, 1819
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1819-04-06
In Error. ERROR to the Common Pleas of Bucks county. Held: that though Craig was at liberty to pursue the right or not, yet this was such an interest in the land as was bound by the judgment against him ; and that the land was consequently bound by the judgment in the hands of Anderson, to whom he had conveyed all his right after the judgment was entered-, and who had obtained a patent…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1995
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1819-04-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →