Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 6

Docket No. 94-7305.

Guy v. Strickland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995 Decided: March 17, 1995

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-17

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on John Wesley Johnson v. George M. Hinkle Henry L. Campbell

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-17

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Samuel Wayne Guy, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Guy v. Strickland, No. CA-93-570 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motions to dismiss and for default judgment

/50/f3d/6 · .json · Public domain