¶1We are all of opinion that replevin is a local action under the existing statutes of this State, and must be commenced in the county where the goods were unlawfully taken. The demurrer must-therefore be overruled, and judgment entered for defendant on the plea in abatement.
50 N.H. 331
Sleeper & Co. v. Osgood
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 15, 1870
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1870-12-15
Replevin, brought by J. H. Sleeper & Go. against J. D. Osgood, for goods, wares, and merchandise, taken by said defendant, at Warren, in the county of Grafton, on the 26th day of July, 1870. The writ was made returnable to, and was entered at this term in said county of Belknap.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1963
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1870-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →