United States v. Strada’s Empirical Analysis
503 F.2d 1081 · 1974
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 2 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably State v. West (2008), State v. Berry (1980)
44 federal appellate · 2 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 18 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1084 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Marion · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Hannah v. Larche
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to satisfy the [sentencing] judge that the conduct of the probationer has not met the conditions of the probation'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“One rationale for the Morrissey preliminary hearing requirement was to provide procedural safeguards with regard to the loss of liberty that accompanied an arrest for parole violations. 408 U.S. at 485-487 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 . Thus, Gagnon extends the right to such a hearing only to those probationers who are taken into custody and deprived of their conditional freedom. This is not the situation in the instant case. Appellant was not taken into custody until sometime after an adversary evidentiary hearing and a finding by the court that appellant had violated the terms of his probation. Thus the holdings in Morrissey and Gagnon are not applicable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] long delay between the issuance of an arrest warrant and its execution may be unreasonable and a deprivation of due process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. West · Gaddy v. Michael
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.