Patterson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 1296 · 2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 26 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Nurriddin v. Bolden (2016), Sewell v. Chao (2008)
1 federal appellate · 26 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 3131
Relies on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Holcomb v. Powell · Regina C. Brown, v. Kenneth D. Brody, Chairman, Export-Import Bank of the United States,
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purely subjective injuries, such as ... loss of reputation, are not adverse actions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.