United States v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2708 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Leon · United States v. Calandra · United States v. Watson · Illinois v. Krull · United States v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not provide for a suppression remedy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lemasters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.