Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

51 F.3d 942

Docket No. 91-3528.

Glock v. Singletary

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 19, 1995.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Stano v. Butterworth · Glock v. Singletary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-04-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2020

3 state decisions

601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶151 F.3d 942

¶2Robert Dewey GLOCK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, Respondent-Appellee.

¶3No. 91-3528.

¶4United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

¶5April 19, 1995.

¶6Martin J. McClain, Chief Asst. Capital Collateral Representative, Gail E. Anderson, Tallahassee, FL, for appellant.

¶7Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tampa, FL, for appellee.

¶8Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 89-00054-CIV-T-17), Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, Judge.

¶9ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

¶10(Opinion October 7, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 36 F.3d 1014)

¶11Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

¶12BY THE COURT:

¶13A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶14IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*

¶15 Judge Rosemary Barkett has recused herself and will not participate

/51/f3d/942 · .json · Public domain