51 Ohio App. 2d 132 - State v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

102 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In the case at hand, the two indictments relate to the same crime; both involve Defendant's involvement with the production of methamphetamines. Both indictments involve the same charges, the same chemicals, and, as mentioned above, the same crime. Accordingly, we do not find Defendant's argument to be well taken. {¶ 14} Defendant's first assignment of error is overruled. ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR II”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Markovanovich, Unpublished Decision (10-24-2007) · State v. Morgan, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2006)

2. ““(E) Consecutive terms of imprisonment imposed shall not exceed: “(1) An aggregate minimum term of twenty years, when the consecutive terms imposed include a term of imprisonment for murder; “(2) An aggregate minimum term of fifteen years, when the consecutive terms imposed are for felonies other than aggravated murder or murder [.]””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 70 Ohio App. 2d 283 - State v. Slider · State v. Elam

3. “of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are based on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, or are part of a course of criminal conduct.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hatfield, 23716 (5-21-2008) · State v. Morgan, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2006)