Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 F.3d 321

Docket No. 94-7062.

Grant v. State T

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 21, 1995. Decided: April 26, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Clifton Footes, Jr. v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-3311)

Edward Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Edward Grant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Grant v. South Carolina, No. CA-93-3311 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 1994). We also deny Grant's motions requesting appointment of counsel and oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/52/f3d/321 · .json · Public domain