Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 MICH 471 - Sutherland v. Carter

Sutherland v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 1907
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Caswell v. Districh · Kaufmann v. Schilling · Fiquet v. Allison · Crouse v. Derbyshire · Kindy v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff was tenant in common of the grain, and after it was threshed she was entitled to her one-half thereof and it was Carter's duty to deliver it to her when she demanded it upon the farm. It was her property, and the action will lie in such a case under the facts found in this record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.