Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 SO2D 105 - Rader v. State

Rader v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2001

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

70195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keir v. State · Tindall v. State · Yarbrough v. State · Miller v. State · Rader v. First Nat. Bank in Palm Beach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “material to the issue upon which the trial was had....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The materiality of the testimony assigned in perjury is always a question of law, and not of fact; hence the judge, and not the jury, is to pass upon the materiality of the testimony; but like many other questions of law, it may become a mixed question both of law and of fact, in which case the court should admit it, limited by proper instructions.... It is the duty of the court to instruct the jury as to what facts constitute "material testimony."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.