¶1MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
¶2On appeal, Charles Coit challenges the legality of the sentence imposed by the District Court (Kittery), on his plea of nolo contendere to a complaint alleging harassment in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 506-A (1983). Because no error in the sentence imposed appears plainly on the face of the record, we affirm the judgment. State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229, 233 (Me.1979).
¶3The entry is:
¶4Judgment affirmed.
¶5All concurring.