Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 CONNAPP 269 - State v. Rolli

State v. Rolli’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably State v. Singh (2002), State v. Ceballos (2003)

40 state decisions

2601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Evans · Vereen v. United States · State v. Couture · Friedland v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding cases, however, [j]urors are not expected to lay aside matters of common knowledge or their own observations and experiences, but rather, to apply them to the facts as presented to arrive at an intelligent and correct conclusion.... Therefore it is entirely proper for counsel to appeal to a jury's common sense in closing remarks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.