¶1The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division. 100 N. J. Super. 485 (1968).
¶2For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Pboctok, Hall, Schettino and Haremar.—-5.
¶3For reversal — None.
53 N.J. 137
Decided January 20, 1969
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1969-01-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1979
1 state decisions
Relies on 100 N.J. Super. 485 - Cornwall v. Kingsley
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1969-01-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division. 100 N. J. Super. 485 (1968).
¶2For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Pboctok, Hall, Schettino and Haremar.—-5.
¶3For reversal — None.