¶1The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8.
¶3For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.
53 N.J.L. 665
Decided June 15, 1891
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1891-06-15
<p>■On error to the Burlington Circuit.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1956
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1891-06-15