Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-02-04

Relies on Alfonso v. State

Decided 2011-02-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Richardson’s Rule 3.800(a)1 motion without prejudice to Richardson’s right to seek additional jail credit pursuant to a legally sufficient motion. See Alfonso v. State, 901 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

¶2. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).